<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD vs. Blu-ray</title>
	<link>http://www.utahopinions.com/index.php/2007/10/23/hd-vs-blu-ray/</link>
	<description>A Hangout for Utahns &#038; Those Interested in Utah Opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 06:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.utahopinions.com/index.php/2007/10/23/hd-vs-blu-ray/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utahopinions.com/index.php/2007/10/23/hd-vs-blu-ray/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Most "new" HD and Blu-ray movies are running around the $30 price, with some exceptions. I found an Evan Almighty duo-pack, which came with both an HD DVD and a standard DVD disc for only $35. Considering I lend a lot of my movies out to friends, this was a great deal for me. I also noticed some older movies at good prices at Amazon.com -- For example, Bourne Identity and Bourne Supremacy are being offered right now for $25.

Personally I have been surprised by Blu-rays strong support in the manufacturer realm, but it's essentially a dead-even split in the studio arena. It would make the "war" really exciting to see someone like Warner select one side or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most &#8220;new&#8221; HD and Blu-ray movies are running around the $30 price, with some exceptions. I found an Evan Almighty duo-pack, which came with both an HD DVD and a standard DVD disc for only $35. Considering I lend a lot of my movies out to friends, this was a great deal for me. I also noticed some older movies at good prices at Amazon.com &#8212; For example, Bourne Identity and Bourne Supremacy are being offered right now for $25.</p>
<p>Personally I have been surprised by Blu-rays strong support in the manufacturer realm, but it&#8217;s essentially a dead-even split in the studio arena. It would make the &#8220;war&#8221; really exciting to see someone like Warner select one side or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fstaheli</title>
		<link>http://www.utahopinions.com/index.php/2007/10/23/hd-vs-blu-ray/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>fstaheli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utahopinions.com/index.php/2007/10/23/hd-vs-blu-ray/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Blu-Ray better drop their player prices fast!!!  HD has the better name and the much better price.  I can see myself buying a $300 player for Christmas, but not a $500 one.

By the way, what are the costs of movie disks in both formats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blu-Ray better drop their player prices fast!!!  HD has the better name and the much better price.  I can see myself buying a $300 player for Christmas, but not a $500 one.</p>
<p>By the way, what are the costs of movie disks in both formats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

